Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
Quote Originally Posted by TIC View Post
Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
Again... not wanting to get into it with anybody, but certain things should be considered.

  1. Symptomatology - It's been 2 full years of the virus now. Plenty of time to have collected eons upon eons of data from people sharing the same symptoms in order to draw the necessary conclusions regarding the existence of the virus.
  2. History of vaccines - It's not a new technology. Vaccines are over 100 years old. Difference is... we didn't have social media "experts" or influencers back then. So people got the vaccines and diseases were put under control. Today we're at a distinct disadvantage.
  3. Personal experiences - At this point many if not most people have either had COVID or known someone who did. They've experienced the symptoms... they've been able to distinguish between having and not having the vaccine (and its effect).



Vaccines in the past provided cures and stopped epidemics and pandemics. But while technology has advanced in the past 100 years... people have honestly become more stupid.
correlation is not proof of causation. the alleged symptoms are numerous & again are not proof of you knowing the virus exists. one hundred years could be considered young in regards to mankind. people have been told they had convid & known someone who was told they did. they may have experienced symptoms but that is not proof of the cause of those symptoms. i'm only interested in what you know to be true, not what you believe. people have become more stupid because they prefer to believe something rather than know it to be true & they prefer their interpretation of something rather than proving that to be true

Reliability of correlations increases with sample size. And there's infinitely more than enough sample size in this case to establish stable correlation. But I'm not interested in discussing statistics with you.

And again... I'm not interested in what you're "only interested in." I feel I've stated that enough, and don't feel the need to elaborate further.

Thankfully your numbers are dwindling. There will always be pockets of people who hold on to those misguided beliefs. But hopefully they'll continue to decrease and become insignificant enough to not get in the way of proven science and medicine.

But hey... good luck with your beliefs.

you have had the vaccine so you have a bias & are unable to even think that you could be wrong. i am asking for proof of the claim the convid is a virus caught from outside the body & passed on through the air or off surfaces. after two years none has been provided. correlation does not imply causation or prove causation. i'm not interested in statistics either. they can be misleading. i'm only interested in claims that can be proved to be true. it's been two years. surely it would have got to me by now. some pandemic where i haven't taken any precautions & still haven't even been ill. please tell me about the science you have conducted to prove convid is a virus caught from outside the body, through the air or off surfaces. & i could give you a list of approved medicines that have been recalled as msm tells or tell you about ignaz semmelweis as msm tells us who's ideas of doctors basically washing hands were rejected by the medical community only one hundred & fifty odd years ago. deaths from medical errors are allegedly huge each year. the so called experts are not infallible. pfizer has been a habitual offender. too big to nail cnn once said. you are still unable to understand that it is you that has a belief & you are free to hold that belief. until you can prove it to be true though, that is all it is. you are not interested in finding & proving the truth, you are only interested in upholding your belief