Quote Originally Posted by Primo Carnera View Post
Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
Primo, you are reading far more into my post than intended. I never said it is ok to take PED or just because he lost he was not guilty.

Strict liability means he is to blame no matter what legitimate reason he has for the substance being in his body.

I agree with you he is misfortune.
No problem, but Mate, perhaps you need to be more careful with what you write. If you put
“ I think he is innocent , what they found in his system was not enough to help”
Then I’m not wrong replying the way I did.

Khan did the job, olympics on to a successful pro career, no question. The mediabollox stuff is unfortunately part and parcel of life now.

Having said that the 'drug' rules seem (by design) difficult for Joe Public to understand or relate to, why? It seems to me that only boxers with cash can contest these so called laws, thats why we get Wild Boar and 50 eggs mitigation. The rule makers seem to be so stupid/corrupt maybe they get a media payoff from these stupid stories? The bottom line is that if your fighter is not with the mainstream promoters and has cash or media influence you have no chance of appealing these arbitrary decisions, if you are Nigel Benn's son you can afford it. WE should be reporting lower level 'judgements' on drugs to see if their is selective corruption going on here.