Re: Crawford needs to fight ffs

Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera

Originally Posted by
TIC

Originally Posted by
Spicoli

Originally Posted by
TIC

Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera

Originally Posted by
TIC

Originally Posted by
Spicoli

Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera

Originally Posted by
Spicoli
Random and it seems to have had little reaction, but Benevidez recently said that Turki aka the Saudi bankroll had mentioned a possible Aug Crawford match and proposed it to David...if he could make 160

. No such request when wanting Bud v Canelo though. And unless I've missed it no one is disputing it? Now with Ortiz v Tszyu on the undercard of Crawford v Madrimov and two belts on the line we may very well see winners meet up!
Did I read that right? Try to make Benavidez come in at 160? Hahaha!
What's crazy is they would even consider it realistic for him. Maybe Turki is learning to play the shifty side of the sport just like all the others because 160 is a nonstarter for a guy already stated he's going the other direction.
let's remember that team david b have been caught lying about offers & signed contracts in the past. if it's true then shouldn't we be calling out bud for trying to drain david b?
It’s not Crawford that wants to drain Benavidez, it’s Turki.
allegedly
Haven't seen anyone affiliated on team-Turki disputing a thing though. I bolieve David on this one. I mean Canelo himself flat said he doesn't see benefit of Crawford and he'd be too small and get zero credit. Yet Turki keeps pitching it.
why would turki even care? just seems strange for david b to say "we never got to that point" then the next second "he did mention one opponent"
Not another Conspiracy theory!



no conspiracy theory. team david b have been caught lying about offers made & agreements before
It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it.
Bookmarks