Quote Originally Posted by TIC View Post
Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
Hey guys, leave TIC alone.

He equates one data point with a whole trend. Rock on, dude.
as usual you are missing the point. spicoli mentioned new record highs. that year book was officially authorized by the government. did you google what the hottest day in australia was? so the question is were the government lying back then or is someone lying now? did you see the spock thing? were the "climate experts" lying then?


Whose point? Your point? That's not unusual. I'm sure I miss your point lots of times.

Lying... lying... lying. What is your fixation with lying?

The point IS... that more than sufficient data exists that global temperatures are slowly trending up. In any data field there are going to be outliers. Anyone with even a rudimentary knowledge of statistics is going to realize that. The fact that snow fell in Florida does not automatically disprove the notion of global warming. I would get into a serious discussion with you about data... but I doubt you will honestly make an effort to understand it.

Global warming data isn't meant for "the sky is falling" reactions. It's just data. Plain and simple. Why on earth would anyone lie about global temperature data? What does anyone have to gain by it? Global warming is global warming... and climate change is climate change. Unless you're a university taught climatologist, I don't think any of us here are certified experts on climate. We can speculate. We can theorize. But none of us here are experts. We have to go by what the available data says. Of course, unless we're naturally skeptical about EVERYTHING... and can't bring ourselves to accept data at face value. Problem with that approach is, you have to counter it with something. Saying: "I don't believe it. Nyah-nyah-nah-nah-nah" just isn't going to cut it.