Hairdoo - You are WRONG . Barrera met Manny at featherweight not Superbantam . Check Boxrec

the_answer - I never said Barrera was past his prime when he lost to Pac . It was an off night . He just wasnt himself that night . The idiots wrote him off and said he was past his prime but he proved them wrong as he will again . You are right Pac is no Nas . Nas was undefeated whereas Pac has been k.o'd a couple times . Plus he was naturally bigger than Barrera . Erik has a stronger chin than Barrera ? Thats why when they met Barrera is the one who scored a knockdown .

Wacko - Keep calling me blind but maybe ive seen something you havent . Dont be deluded here . Pac was beating a warmed up corpse last night . Its all he's done since the Barrera fight . You think Barreras guna stand in punching range and employ suicidal tactics like Morales ? No way mate . Barrrera proved last time the difference between being focused and not focused against Juarez . Why do ya think the 1st one was so hard but the second 1 was easy . I respect your opinion but I do think its silly for you to write off a great like Barrera

Icecoldboxing - Maybe fluke is the wrong wording judging by how youve interpreted it . Off night is where things just didnt happen . He had an offnight against Juarez but it didnt mean he was past his prime . He put it right here in the return so he can do it again . How do you justify the reasons why he did so better in the return against Rocky ? Its easy cuz he was focused the second time and wasnt in the 1st fight . Same story with Pac