I completely disagree. Picking out Sanders rare losses, Rahman, Vitaly (+ a fluke) is so unfair. Give that Sanders knocked down Rahman and psuhed down and hit Vitaly. In no fight did he go down; he was standing with his hands up, not throwing back enough and the fight was stopped. So the Rahman fight was his to win, and he stood up to Vitaly, and beat Wlad; ARE YOU NUTS? If he wasnt that good, why didnt Vitaly knock him out?Originally Posted by right_cross
Totally unfair. I would say that Sanders is one of the greatest the last 10 years; Vitaly, Sanders, Lewis, its just that things never came together right. He almost KO Rahman, and Vitaly in early rounds; he could have won both, it was close.
Bookmarks