
Originally Posted by
Gyrokai
This evolution bullsh*t is stupidity at its finest. Especially when applied to boxing. ESPECIALLY.
Why though? I used to be of the same thought and I think that there are a bunch of exceptions to the rule (Robinson, Leonard, Hearns, Hagler ect.) but the sport evolves. Now I don't know much about boxing training but surely fighters get better with time right? I mean look at the gap between the fighters from the 40's to the 60's. I love Willie Pep. I mean I LOVE Willie Pep. 3rd greatest pound for pound fighter of all time in my book, but if he were fighting Sugar Ramos...would he have stood a chance? No. How would Ramos fair against Arguello? Probably not very good. I mean the sport evolves and what reason is there to beleive it stops? Now maybe it is slowing down (I think it's clear that the elite fighters from the 80's aren't to far behind the elite fighters of today's age) but has it completely stopped? Don't think so.
There has to be better training nowadays, and in the last 20 years or so we've seen boxing progress from something that was still sort of a tooth and nail blood sport to be much more technical and even more of a science, especially from welterweight up.
Like I said, there isn't as much of a gap between the elite fighters, but the sport has advanced nonetheless. I'm not a total suscriber to the evolution theory but I do think it still applies a little bit.
Bookmarks