If this is true then it's a F****** disgrace.
What other sport is there in the entire world where if the organisers don't like the result of a match they can order it to be replayed?
And then even when a fighter/player wins again more convincingly they can then decide to still not stick that person in the final and instead allow somebody who has been retired for 3 years to take his place.
If this story is true then surely Peter has a legal case against the WBC?
Forcing to him rebeat somebody he had already beaten was wrong, now making him step aside so that Vitali can just sidestep his way in is just out and out corruption.

Bookmarks