You can't say that because Duran had just gone through a war with Hagler the year before and that took alot out of him. Hearns hadn't gone through as much as Duran, and he was still fresh... Duran wasn't. Duran was slow, and his defense was sloppy that fight, and he came back down from middleweight to fight Hearns, and that took alot out of him because he was up 190 before he came back down, and at 33 thats really hard to accomplish.Originally Posted by althetruthhindley
Its like saying that Glen Johnson or Tarver would have stood against against Roy Jones Jr. in his prime. Or that Terry Norris is better than Leonard because he beat him when he was older.


Thanks:
Likes:
Dislikes: 

Reply With Quote
Bookmarks