Why Hasnt Wlad Avenged His Losess

[BoomBoom]

I don't know why he should have to?I could understand if he was the undisputed heavyweight champ like Lennox Lewis was when Rahman beat him, of course he wanted a rematch because he had all the belts!And as far as McCall it was 3 years later that he finally went after him and that was because it was for the vacant WBC belt.Why would Wladimir at this point go after Sanders and Brewster , neither of them have a belt and that is his goal right now and that is what everyone wants isn't it?

he should of tried to of revenged them losses before he cant do it now its too late now and i think them losses will hurt his legacy like it would of done to lewis if he wouldnt have revenged losses

What about Tyson and Buster Douglas?Holmes and Tyson?Mercer and Lewis?Foreman and Ali?Foreman and Young, is that what people remember, why didn't he get a rematch because that really hurts his legacy .Foreman and Holyfield?I could go on and on but I just don't see the point.Fighters lose sometimes, but when they go on and consistantly beat better fighters from then on I don't see why those loses would do anything to hurt their legacy.

When you lose to another champion, youre right it doesnt hurt their legacy. But when you lose to a Corrie Sanders or a Ross Puritty its a little different imo. The guys you listed were all greats.