Majesty
Spot on man, PBF delivered and proved us all wrong.


Quote Originally Posted by SweetPea
There's a huge flaw in using the first Castillo fight as the big example of how to beat Mayweather. That line of reasoning assumes that the 2002 version of Mayweather is the same as the 2007 version. And that's not true.
His defense is better, his straight right hand is much better. His ability to work off the ropes is better.
The things that Castillo did to give Mayweather problems don't work as well now as they used to.

If you'd asked me on that night in 2002 if Floyd could move up and win titles at 147, I probably would have said no.
Yet he has moved up successfully and won titles, and it's because he's made a lot of improvements and is a much better fighter now than he was then.
I'm not saying that is the way to beat PBF, I'm saying PBF is not unbeatble people throw names out in the air of fighters hes beat look at the names and tell me the names are the best that are/were around?
The JLC fight shows that PBF is beatable so when I commented earlier on a Cotto-PBF fight and said how woudl it go?
The answer I got from Majesty was plain and simple as if it had already happened or it was a 100% defenitive answer.

Quote Originally Posted by Majesty
I'll give you one, imagine Cotto being dominated.
Then you have that fight
My answer to that was

Easier said then done.
So you see my arguement was that PBF would not complete dominate Cotto and my arguement surged with saying that the JLC fight was my fav. performace of his. Indicating that he has struggled before and would not dominate Cotto.

And I agree about the PBF of 2002 vs. PBF of 2007 are not the same, but isn't it also unfair to say that PBF would beat Cotto cause hes beat fighters that are somewhat like Cotto? I read that all the time.....
Or that PBF would beat Margarito cause PBF beat N'dou and Margarito is similar to N'dou...... The street runs both ways......