Quote Originally Posted by Beanflicker
Ok, here is my question to all you people who make these top p4p lists. How can you guys rank guys like Henry Armstrong, Sandy Saddler, Willie Pep, ect ect ect, SO HIGH when you may have seen only 2 or 3 of their fights (or, in many cases, none at all). What is the justification for having these guys so high? Do you rank them based on online and newspaper articles written about them? I don't understand it really...
They are ranked based on their resumes obviously, as should be the top criteria for rating fighters. Duh!