Quote Originally Posted by El Gamo
"i messed up my first post had to revise it..

above i tell the reasons i think hatton will be better than winky d-hop and taylor..

winky lost to vargas and drew to taylor,... floyd is the best didnt mention him....., b-hop lost to taylor twice, taylor hasnt ever had a ko in a big fight THOSE WAS ALL BIG FIGHTS.. not that off on the statement...

NO ONE IS SAYING HATTON SHOULD BE #1 JUST BECAUSE HE BEAT MAYWEATHER.... WHY DO YOU ALL KEEP ACTING LIKE THAT is A DISCUSSION POINT... if i thought that is all it took i would have even started the thread... he would undoubtable be #1 p4p if that was the case... there is no point in saying that..."

hatton is currently #8 ring p4p.. obviously its more than one victory that will make hatton p4p #1 if he becomes #1...

as far as being critical of opponents...no one has had there opponents critcized more than hatton and calzaghe

I presume you meant B Hop? Ive already said,multi weight world champ,20 plus defences etc etc.Most thought Winky beat Vargas. And a draw with Taylor is no bad thing,JT is a P4P himself. Jermain not having a KO in a big fight has absolutely NO RELEVANCE whatsoever to him being a pound for pounder. No one has stopped Winky or B Hop.

I'm not going to keep going through the same things over and over again. I've dissected your posts, and you just say the same things over and over.

And you made the thread right? So what are you talking about with the highlighted part? You asked the question "Is Hatton #1 P4P if he beats Mayweather" YOU are asking the question,I gave you a MULTITUDE of reasons why he shall not be. May be you should alter it to something more appropriate if you are not getting the responses you are seeking.
i'm repeating some points of importance as are you..and gave resonable reasons against all of your competitors for not being #1

and pac is better p4p than b-hop winky or taylor, i dont know why you are talking about them rather than pac.

its either pac, r. marquez. or hatton if hatton wins

i dissected your statements pretty soundly too and gave rebuttals to almost every point you have made... this is far from a one-sided discussion...

a couple of posters keeping discussing the point that hatton cant be made #1 by beating PBF cause tarver and taylor didnt while beating a #1.. no one is saying soley based on hatton beating mayweather.. which a couple of posters seem to be implying.. so they are discussing a point that no one is saying is true in the first place... in other words, its apparent stop repeating it..

taylor not knocking out jr. middle-weights when he is a middle-weight is relevant if you are trying to be #1p4p.. hatton knocked out his top rivals...

my main point is everyone has a little cracks in the armour beside mayweather... which means hatton is as worthy as anyto be #1 if he beats mayweather.. but i could see pac. and r. marquez being #1 also..

cc gamo: youve made alot of good points and told your side's view well.....................sometimes i am probably a little too aggressive in my wording, i dont mean any disrespect...