Quote Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
Quote Originally Posted by Fire
Quote Originally Posted by joedadi
Klitschko, overly protected yet possibly the top heavyweight now, earned, gained nothing last night.
Brewster hadn't fought in a year, hadn't won in two years. Brock, Byrd and the rest where carefully chosen because they where light punching opponents. Even in the weak division, Wlad can find more guys to avoid than to fight.
Wlad has fought by far the best competition of any HW since Lewis...

byrd beat vitali.. concidered a dangerous threat the first time they fought....

peter was a very dangerous opponent for him especially at that point in his career, sanders was a risky fight, both brewster fights were risky all very hard punchers...

come to think of it i think wlad has faced every huge puncher of the current HW's today...
Since Lewis left hw era has been weak so thats not saying whole lot is it ?? Byrd only beat Vitali because of injury Vitali had plus Vitali was dominating Byrd 1st Brewster fight was not a risk Brewster had beaten nobody at that time and was not really considered to give Wlad trouble at all so that is why it was considered a major upset i agree with Sanders fight though.
sanders and peter was very dangerous...

regardless of who brewter beat everyone knew he hits with a load and although people thought he would beat him he was still concidered dangerous.. byrd was concidered one of the best HW defencively currently(i know i know that aint saying much)

HEY ICE me and you disagree on almost everything but i can really appreciate your debating skills and boxing knowledge.. when i debate alot of people about hatton, klitch, calzaghe its very annoying because they are all about opinions, and you come with the facts (or close to it ) and i know your young, i cant imagine your boxing knowledge when you get in your 30's ..

cc to ya ICE for giving me legit debates... not just a bunch of nonsense..