Quote Originally Posted by Beanflicker
Quote Originally Posted by DaxxKahn
Quote Originally Posted by Beanflicker
Quote Originally Posted by DaxxKahn
Joe Louis...When you actually look at his record he has about 10 good names and he lost to some of them....

Froma appearence of record on paper you would never guess he is the second greatest HW to ever fight
LOL, and people have to ask if boxing fans are too hard on boxers for losing. 69-3 and you're saying that is ugly? Joe Louis has one of the most spectacular records in boxing history.

The one that jumps to my mind is Jersey Joe Walcott (51-1
Before you make comments maybe you should read all the post and see why Joe Louis was mentioned in the first place
Sorry, and I'm not someone who likes to take shots at people, but I still am dumbfounded as to why you brought up Joe Louis. Taking into the account of the description of the thread in the original post, I have no idea how you thought of Joe Louis. It baffles me.



















Once again I took it as being names on resumes.....

Take a look at Louis Resume in 73 fights.....

once again while you sit there baffled at why I said that I am baffled how you missed

Quote Originally Posted by DaxxKahn
Quote Originally Posted by CutMeMick
Quote Originally Posted by DaxxKahn
Joe Louis...
Really?
3 loses in 72 fights isn't bad.


The way I understood the question was in a win vs. loose ratio?
You might be answering it in a different aspect.

















You may be right I was looking at it by amount of quality names on resume??....

If we are going by win loss then I take my pick back














Where I even said I take my pick back....Must have not been showing up on your screen huh?......