Quote Originally Posted by Fenster
Quote Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
Quote Originally Posted by Fenster
Quote Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
Quote Originally Posted by Fenster
Quote Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
Quote Originally Posted by Fenster
Quote Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
Quote Originally Posted by ACEA
well the first round was pritty close i just like Taylors work more the Pavliks thats all Taylor started well and finshed the round well you could make and argument for either fighter. I am not a fan of either fighter i scored the fight as i saw it a lot of people think im full of S*** but hey none of us are professional judges so i think its kinda harsh to flame me.
You gave first round to Taylor even though Pavlik landed 43 out of 89 and Taylor landed 26 out of 72
ahahaa

You count those whilst watching it LIVE!?!?!
Pavlik won the first round clearly anyone who knows how to score a boxing fight properly knows Pavlik won the first round comfortably i was just telling him the punchstats indicating he needs to watch the fight again.
The arrogance

Look at WACKO's RD by RD for the 1st - "Hard to score but Pavlik get’s that one" - Hard to score indicates it could of gone either way. Does Wacko not know what he's watching?

Former "world" champ Glenn McCrory scoring for SKY TV gave the 1st to Taylor. He doesn't know what he's watching either?

Behave.
Well unless you count punches hitting the gloves because Pavlik clearly won the round i bet if Wacko watched it again he would agree and yes Fenster your right Glenn McCrory can't be wrong because every boxer is a good judge thats why people Like McGuigan and Mason only had Lewis winning the first Holyfield fight by 1 point and that fight was about easy to score as making a bowl of cereal.
Agree to what? That he doesn't know how to score a fight.. in your opinion?

What does "Glen McCrory can't be wrong" have to do with anything? I was showing you a respected commentator had a different opinion of who won the round. You're saying he doesn't know what he's doing, right?
Ok maybe i went bit far when i said this comment.

anyone who knows how to score a boxing fight properly knows Pavlik won the first round comfortably


But come on Fenster Pavlik clearly won the round and as for McCrory he judged the round very poorly he should of seen Pavlik landed the better shots and the more shots and that alot of Taylor's punches were being blocked and the punchstats are the icing on the cake.
Punchstats are used with hindsight they're no good when scoring a fight live.

The point is, unless the fight is a complete shut-out people see things unfold slightly different. Silly to claim people don't know what they're watching after you've had repeated viewings and punchstats to back up your point.
I scored it for Pavlik comfortably when i was watching it for the first time when i replied to ACEA on page 2 i had only watched it once fact of matter is Pavlik won the round if your claiming someone won a round like he was with Taylor atleast watch it for a 2nd time and some people on this forum said they have watched the fight like 3 times and still had Taylor up by 3 rounds and have Taylor winning the 1st round and that escapes me it really does atleast take the punchstats into consideration when they are highly in favor of Pavlik.

Watching it live watching it 5 times watching it with the sound on or off it doesn't really matter Pavlik won the first round comfortably.