Should There Be 3 Knockdown's Rule ??

[donnydarkoIRL]

Again I feel like it should depend on the ref or corner to end the fight... I mean if the fighter gets KD in the 1st 10 secs of the round from a flash gets up at 2, gets KD by a flash at 1:30 of a round and then Flashed again with 10sec left then the fight would be over... On the otherhand when a fighters in trouble even with the 3 KD rule alot of times the ref calls the fight after a 2nd KD anyway.

Then there are instances like Morrison and Bentt when 3 KD were just right in that fight and there could be no complaints either way.

I guess what I am saying is that the 3 KD rule is great EXCEPT in an instance when a fighter is flashed 3x in a round but i clearly fit to continue... Like stated above there are plenty of times where the 3 KD is in effect but when a fighter is hurt the ref waves after 2 KD an way

But Jt, in reallity a fighter whomgets knocked down three times (even if they are flash knockdowns) has no businesss being in the ring with a fighter with the skills to do that to him...

So Marquez had no business being in the ring with Pac after getting floored three times?

How come Pac didn't knock him out in the next round?

Cos they were planning on making a bundle in the rematch LoL

Good answer.


It shows though that the three knockdown rule doesn't work.

Fenster a rule is needed to ensure referees protect fighters more. Katsidis Earl should have been stopped. Both men will feel the effects in the future...Why risk damaging more boxers