Quote Originally Posted by Lyle
Quote Originally Posted by hitmandonny
Quote Originally Posted by Master
McCall and Rachman must then be a billion to one chance then.
Can you say the same for Williams, Holyfield, Douglas, Lewis and even McBride in relation to Tyson though?
Average Tyson Fan response: "But he was past his prime"

It's so easy to explain Tyson's losses
But of course, however, these same fans are limiting Tyson's prime in years.
If his prime was that short, was he really that great?

It's Ironic that Tyson's fans use Lewis' KO losses to display that Tyson was better. Yet not only do Tyson's defeats outnumber Lennox's, they also come to poorer opposition.
Is douglas better than Rahman? Not In my opinion.
Is McCall poorer than Danny Williams? I think not.

And the very salt in the wounds of Tyson fans, Evander Holyfield.
Was he not beaten in the first fight against Lewis (despite judges decision...)
WAS a past prime LEWIS NOT ABLE TO QUESTIONABLY WIN A DECISION?)