"I know i typed this before, but i have the same answer to the same argument

Educate yourself before you make such stupid comments. Many reputable martial artists, world champions who knew him said one of his best assests is his way of closing the distance, that means moving in and out of range. As for camera's, it is a fact that they actually had to slow him down cos he was simply too fast for the camera and everything was just a blurr."

What are you on about you fool?? You think by repeating what you said before this gives it some authority? I'm not going by what some brown nosers, who probably have cashed in on the back of his career have said. For example the link you give

http://www.cityonfire.com/unknown/interviews/demile/

Here's the intro line "With Sijo James DeMile, friend of Bruce Lee and founder of Wing Chun Do."
I'm sure he's not cashing in and using the name for his own gains.

Where is the evidence? Find some and I'll respect your point of view, but don't make the mistake of coming out with such idiotic comments as to educate myself like above.

You appear to be living in some sort of dream world.
For example
" For those who's just simply going with pacman cos hes a boxer, I wonder if you have ever actually sparred with a master martial artist. Not your karate black belts but true masters....it becomes a different ball game when they have mastered 100 ways to attack you whilst you only know to attack in 5-6 and defend against 5-6 moves"

I'm not going with pacman because he's a boxer, it was based on a comparable weight and size to Bruce and that there is proven evidence of his power.

100 ways to attack? If you get sparked the rest is immaterial, while they're considering their options an all round fighter will take them down and out.

As I said previously show some evidence and I'll consider otherwise.