Well then you agree that DLH should lose?Originally Posted by TyBuff
Name a fight that was ever put forward for the purpose of moving boxing forward. There has always been money involved in bringing fights together. If that wasnt the case we would never have those arguments about fighters ducking each other. Its a sad fact but that is the way boxing has been and will be. People doing what they can to make money.Originally Posted by Starr
Mayweather De la hoya fight doesn't do anything to move boxing forward at all. It's just a waste of timeOriginally Posted by The_One77
I don't get it, i would love to see Floyd fight Oscar rather than Magarito....Originally Posted by Starr
Well wacko look at it this way. yes Mayorga winning moves forward boxing. Because if Oscar wins, we will get a waste of time because he will fight Mayweather, and that is a fight that will not move boxing forward one bit, whats the point of that fight for boxing other then money? Does it move boxing forward one bit? If Oscar loses, then Mayweather fights Margarito, and though he would win that fight relatively easily, it would move boxing forward.Originally Posted by wacko3205
...and Mayorga winning does? Come on...Originally Posted by Starr
Why would anyone want De la hoya to win? Him winning doesn't move boxing forward at all. De La Hoya Mayweather wouldn't move boxing forward at all.![]()
Agree?
Mayorga's going down!
Which fight means more. Delahoya Mayweather. Or Mayweather Margarito?
Bookmarks