Who had the better career Tito or De La Hoya?

[Mikkel_K]

Opinions guy's, I would love to hear them, you guy's already know who I think, but either way you vote it's close

I think most people will answer this question the same way they would answer the question "who won between Tito or De La Hoya?"

I for one is no different. And I go with De La Hoya.

I agree that most will answer this question by looking at their fight. But I don't agree that that is how it should be done. In fact, to be fair, I think their fight together should be excluded from this debate since it was really a low point on both of their careers. In their career defining moment at the very peak of their game they both choked and both of their stocks plumeted that day.

I dont think that their fight should necessarily be the way to jugde their careers, I merely think how you view that fight may very well reflect on the career question as well.

One unmentioned thing that De La Hoya has going for him as well is that he could actually still manage to win a title. I don't believe Tito would be able to do that (also because he'd be unlikely to come down to his best weight(s))