Quote Originally Posted by Taeth View Post
Mayweather isn't that cheap... He just uses his forearms which much fighters don't ahve that much difficulty with the problem with Hatton coming in is that he changes angles and that elbow that usually stops mayweather's opponenets from throwing right hands was making contact with Hatton, but you are obviously a Brit, and thus way too biased to approach this logically... I mean Calzaghe isn't exactly a fair fighter either.. He slaps a lot of his punches which is illegal to not hit with the punching part of the glove, He hits while he is in a clinch. Also no judge had Hopkins up 4 rounds, and Joe didn't clearly win that fight, every expert is agreeing with that it was a close fight, or every expert that knows what they are talking about.
I hear people express that description all the time. I would like to know what merits the label Boxing Expert? I see so many use that term in their arguments like it extends more authority and trust over the average die hard fan.

If you find an answer, please enlighten me.