Question for the biblical religious

[pacfan]

Micro evolution is a fact. And it is the only type of evolution that is anything more than a theory or hypothesis. The problem is using it to prove MACRO took place.

In a court room proving that a person stole candy when they were little, doesn't prove they just robbed the bank down the street. It's not physical evidence. All the evidence presented is micro not macro.

Still let's focus on this...

The reproduction of a species sexually. How many generations would it have taken to master it? Was there some other way of reproducing in place for that species until it was replaced by sexual reproduction?

Did the female and male species have to evolve at the same time?

First off, luvfightgame, I'm not trying to contradict you, or any of you here. But I'll be borrowing your point to prove my point.

As I've said, I have no problem with evolution. I think God can work through either creation or evolution. That's not impossible for me because I don't interpret the Bible literally. I think if there was an evolution, I think it was a guided evolution, guided somewhere from above, not the haphazard trial and error method as espoused by scientists, or else, I think it would have been an ugly evolution, not the perfectly symmetrical type we see in reality. That's the only way how some questions like how both sexes evolved simultaneously and why we were given eyebrows, which beautifully protect our eyes from our own sweat but which has nothing to do with our 'ability to multiply', which is the sole goal of the pure evolution theorists.

You know, folks, you may not believe this but there is this channel through which all these powers flow, call it whatever you wish, universal energy, universal mind or God Himself. This is the channel through which lifeforms on earth are guided, this is also the channel where all religious pray thru, and this is the channel through which we receive our knowledge... ...and this is also the channel where I get my ideas. Nuts, heh? Ask Andre.