Quote Originally Posted by The Fightfan View Post
Lately there has been alot of hooplah about David Haye taking over the heavyweight division and taking out the Klitschko and such.The thing I must show to you is this.Carl Thompson is a good fighter and no where near Klitschko skill wise or power wise.So if David Haye is the man to take over the heavies what the hell is this then.Over and over again Thompson is able to land a straight right hand to the head of Haye he simply has no defense for this.What do you think Klitschko would do to Haye who has an even faster and harder blinding straight hand.It's not about how you look folks it's about how it's done.


<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="<A href="http://www.youtube.com/v/uPhoascjh3A&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param">http://www.youtube.com/v/uPhoascjh3A&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/uPhoascjh3A&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

I put Hayes dodgy chin on him losing so much weight making the 200lb limit.

I promise you this: David Haye will make a better heavyweight than he was a Cruserweight. Use that as a guide not an old fight against Carl Thompson, Haye is not that fighter anymore he lernt more from that than any victory.

Let me also counter you daft argument: If Wlad got hit with Purities right hand and hurt what will Hayes do?

Bringing up loses years ago to discredit fighters is beyond lame esp if a fighter has won every fight since and dominate world title fights. Thats like bringing up Vince Phillips win over Tszyu or McCalls win over Lewis, they mean nothing.