Quote Originally Posted by Team_Klitschko View Post
We basing this on prime-times? Wlad now, Vitali before?

If so, Vitali takes the win pretty easy.

You look at Wlad and he is this ripped, muscular beast.
You look at Vitali and he isn't as defined as Wlad, nor does he seem to have the muscle mass of the two.

First impressions, Wlad looks the dominant one.

If you watching the fights though, Vitali is the winner. He had much more power in his prime then Wlad does. I was amazed at how he dropped Danny Williams with that tiny jab/uppercut...if you can even call it that...
Wlad has power of course. He hits guys and you see they wonder what just happened but not as devastating as Vitali's power.

Also, the chin and defence. Vitali took some wicked hits. Lewis uppercut that would of dropped anyone else and some good blows from Sanders. Yet he stayed put and kept fighting on...
He also could dodge well. That lean-in, lean-back style he does is very effective for him.

Wlad doesn't seem to be able to defend as well and as we've seen, he can't take hits like his brother can.

Vitali is surely the better of the two prime speaking.
Though Wlad should never be underestimated.

To add... I put 7-10 more victories on Wlad's career...and he goes down as one of the, if not THE, best HW fighter in history.
The best heavy in history? Are you joking? You have to face great opposition for that to happen. Wlad has been beaten by bums (although I think he would beat them all back) Sanders, Brewster and Purrity. Look at Ali for example in his younger days before he was too old he got beat off Frazier who is a legend and also Norton a very good fighter at least. Could you really imagine them who beat Wlad doing Ali, Frazier, Foreman, Norton, Holmes, Louis, Marciano, Dempsey, Holyfield, Lewis, Tyson, Liston or any of the other great heavys throughout history because I couldn't.