Quote Originally Posted by ICB View Post
Quote Originally Posted by Markusdarkus View Post
I actually think it ranks with:

Mayweather v Castillo I, Barerra v Morales I and Holyfield v Lewis I

As one of the worst dec ive seen live.
How was Mayweather vs Castillo 1 a terrible decision ? i only had Castillo winning by 1 point, but there were quite alot of close rounds. And you could make an arguement that either fight won 7 rounds. And i think Mayweather done very well considering he had a bad soulder injury.

Barerra is one of my favorites but again how was it a terrible decision ? the knockdown was BS and shouldn't have been called, but even with the knockdown its still a very close fight. I had Barrera winning because he landed the harder shots.

But in no way was it a terrible decision. And considering Barerra got a controversial win in the 2nd fight, i think it was fair that were 1-1 until the 3rd fight which Barrera proved he was the better man without any controversy.

I totally agree with Lewis vs Holyfield 1 that was indeed a robbery, Holyfield at best only won 3 rounds.


I love how subjective scoring is.

But because Barerra got a gift in the rematch doesnt mean the first result was in anyway just.

And i thought Castillo was up 4pts maybe 5. 100 more power shots 150 more shots landed. i know compubox is not to be taken as a sure but mahone!