Quote Originally Posted by ono

Ok so which welters are better then collazo? Margarito? maybe altho he wouldn't outbox collazo! Judah.....hell no not on his last few showings. Baldomir? nope. Gatti? probably not, Shane Mosley? maybe about 2-3 years ago. And then we come to mayweather.. How does anyone know how mayweather would go on against a natural primed welterweight Zab Judah gave him all he could handle early on....and this is a fighter who has been beaten almost everytime he has stepped up....wether u agree or not, judah has lost to cory spinks, kostya tszyu and baldozar. Beating micky ward and a junior witter who had just fought in a 4 rounder does not make you world class. Mayweather looked far from the best fighter in the world in his only 2 outings at welter..but he got the W. So did Ricky Hatton. Its about time people respected that.
I'm sorry, mate, are you joking? Margarito, Judah, Shane, Mayweather and possibly Baldomir are all better than Collazo. It's the Shane part that's most ridiculous in your post though. Sure, he's a little past his prime, but if he were back down at 147 he'd get some of his speed back; he's more skilled than Collazo; and he's WAY more powerful than Collazo (in fact, every single WW fighter you mentioned is WAY more powerful than Collazo). If you think Collazo is so great (by virtue of his performance against Ricky), then you must think that he's a top 10 p4p fighter (as I suppose you think Ricky is), right?