
Originally Posted by
hitmandonny
The Olympics comprises of the best amateurs.
In order to gain qualification you must perform in one of several high quality tournaments. Bad amateurs do not make the olympics.
The fact that the majority of the world am champs were beaten in provisional stages should demonstrate the quality within the olympic tournament.
Because a boxer looks poor does not mena he is bad, it means the other was better.
You haven't got 5 fights, so you're hardly qualified to judge.
What do you mean im not qualified to judge ? and what does it matter how many fights i've had ? all you have to do is open your eyes, and watch how they fight to see if there any good isn't that obvious ?
Secondly so your saying every single boxer in the Olympic's, are special fighters with *above average* talent ? Donny did you see some of the bums they had in the Heavyweight division ? they had fighters who looked like they were tough man contest fighters not boxers.
And did you watch some of the Korean and European fighters ? they were rubbish. End of not because the other fighter was better, its because they wern't good fighters. I seriously disagree with you on this, im not saying the Olympics isn't special tournament. Hell thats my dream to go to the Olympics.
But sometimes i wonder to myself how do atleast 20 percent of these boxers, even make it to the Olympics ?
Bookmarks