Quote Originally Posted by Manuel "Chubby" Medina View Post
Quote Originally Posted by SaddoBoxer View Post
Quote Originally Posted by JT Rock View Post

Like I said

JMM was a friggin draw the 1st time and Pac got a Xmas present in the 2nd fight... Far from beatings.. JMM fuked up Pac's face pretty bad too dude..

David Diaz who gives a poop about that ham and egger, he was a paper champion to begin with.. Now all of a sudden its relevant that Pac beat him up.. I got news for you dude, Erik Morales beat that joker and got shafted.. Yea the same Erik Morales that you brag about Pac turning into a shot fighter
Even if the judges saw PAC-JMM 1 as a draw, it does not change the fact that PAC gave JMM a beating... You could make a case that JMM also gave PAC a beating but that's another story or thread...

PAC definitely gave Erik Morales the worst beating in Erik's whole boxing career... PAC was the 1st one for knocked down Erik and the 1st boxer to stop the granite chin Morales... This fact can't be denied...

So PAC giving boxing legends (Barrera, JMM, Morales, DelaHoya) a worst beating, it's also possible PAC will give it to Hatton, isn't it?? Am I right??
.
Even if Pac gave Barrera, Morales, DLH, and JMM which i dont think was so bad...
Hatton is a total different fighter than all of those in so many ways.
Styles make fights.
Hatton is closest to prime than all 4 of them.
Hatton is 140 KING.
Hatton will test Pacman in so many ways.
Im not ruling out Pacman I juzz think Hatton is at an advantage so im giving him the odds.
Good opinion and I respect that... This is what I expect as answer to my question... Actually it is just a simple yes or no question but you guys wanted to change some facts... Is it really that difficult to accept these facts that PAC gave a worst beating to some boxing legends?? I think it's not hard to accept...
.