as I've explained before. It's how you have consistently weighted your argument, here and elsewhere to play down the fact that Barrera was severely handicapped by the cut from the first round onwards, he also hurt Khan. What I have read is how great Khan looked or how dominant he was.

If you or anyone else believes that he looked great pay equal attention the circumstances that made it so.
If he were so great and Barrera such a sloth he shouldn't have been able to touch him, fact is he did despite the serious disadvantage he was under.

Why should he get credit for not very much at all? Certainly not the way it's been ladled on him by the press.

If you make references to my favourite boxer having parkinsons disease then I reserve the right to neg rep you or anyone else and I don't have to justify it. Stop trying to play the wide-eyed innocent here.