To be fair Oscay never got a chance to get off, Pacquiao was too quick to get in and out
Pac looked fast against him because Oscar simply didn't do anything. He didn't even look like he was trying at all: no jab, no straights, no hooks, no uppercuts, no legs, no nothing. When he lost vs Mosley and Hopkins, different story. Oscar was TRYING offering all his arsenal. Didn't look that bad loosing. Even with his loss against Hopkins I still think he looked ok offering all he had until he got knocked down. Too bad for him.
Floyd is overall more skilled but he didn't have the opposition Pacman had till now AND to measure the skills that Roach gives to his boxers and the skills Mayweather Sr gives, you have to measure it with let's say their top 10 boxers respectively, not only one, especially as Mayweather has been trained mostly by his uncles in his most significants matches
Good points. I think Pac has faced better opposition. But when it comes to overall skills, Mayweather hands down. Like I have said before, he is yet to show any clear weakness/flaw. Maybe that weakness/flaw is called Pac . Wouldn't that make it a good line to promote their fight if they ever face each other?