Quote Originally Posted by Bilbo View Post
Quote Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales View Post
i get what you're saying, but honestly i don't it'll ever happen, especially when they wont even make instant replay a part of the sport, i think that judges like Adalaide Byrd and Glen Hammada, among others should seriously get penalized for ridiculous scores like Hammada's in the Diaz/Malignaggi fight and well almost every Fernando Vargas fight that Byrd scored, if the commission's would have a fine for favoritism lol maybe they'd get their shit together
Yeah I agree but I think it would work better than the current situation.

The main thing is, that unlike human judges, computers would get better and more accurate over time as technology improved and those working on it came up with better programming and algorithms.

In the 21st century its inexcusable imo that modern technology such as instant replays and compubox type stats arn't made available to the referee's and judges and used to come to better and fairer decisions.

Boxing insists on living in the early 20th century in so many ways. I know they are not the only sport to do so but it's a problem in boxing because its far and away the worst sport in the world for correctly getting a result.
main reason they don't want instant replay is cause then the committee that has to review the tapes won't be necessary, meaning it'd save money lol, instead of spending god knows how long to evaluate a tape then (more times then not) do nothing about the situation, with instant replay the ref would be able to make the call and decide right then and there