Who won? Froch? Or Dirrell?

[Kel]

I'm sorry mate but you cannot award a fighter credit because he was coming forward and landing nothing where the other guy was moving back but landing shots.

I know you can't but like the others you don't address the falling to the knees shit, same as the Hopkins fans don't seem to remember Bernard clutching his balls like a fucking loser trying to steal the fight againsed Joe.

One guy wants to fight, the other tries to steal it by doing stupid shit like faking fouls and going to his knees. As a judge what the fucking hell would you do seriously?

"He is trying to get a point taken off Joe to win the fight, what genius"

"I like the guy who keeps falling to his knees to avoid shots, smart stuff"

What has Bernard got to do with this ? We are talking about Dirrell - Froch.

Dirrell wasn't faking anything, Froch fought a very dirty fight.

What Dirrell did like clinching etc shouldn't affect the scoring unless the ref takes action like deducting a point. Dirrell was still landing more and throwing more.

Based on the 4 scoring criterias in a fight:

Clean Effective Punching
Effective Aggression
Ring Generalship
Defense

Dirrell clearly won.

It's all in black and white (depending on your monitor settings) what I had to say, the Hopkins reference was an example, but you already knew that I hope.