Quote Originally Posted by hattonthehammer View Post
Quote Originally Posted by JazMerkin View Post
Quote Originally Posted by hattonthehammer View Post

each to their own dirrell came on nicely towards the end of the round and landed some crisp shots. But he also had to take some in the process and while it was pretty much the only time he tried to trade with froch it was evident he was asserting pressure through lunging all over a precise froch instead of actually throwing the cleaner punches.
Yes, he took some in the process, but in that round he DEFINITELY gave out more. You don't score it for Froch just because he managed to connect once or twice, Dirrell bossed the whole round. Froch still was barely landing, you cannot call it precise, the one throwing & landing the cleaner punches was the guy who staggered his opponent at the end of the round (hint - it wasn't Froch).

As said each to their own

It wasnt by no means a resounding round and the only positive to come out from it was the decisive and totally just point deduction for dirrell that came 4-5rounds to late to actually get a fight going
My goodness. I'm from Nottingham and would class myself as a Froch fan, probably a biased one at that, but he cleary should have lost. Your constant, dilusional love of British boxers is unbearable.