Quote Originally Posted by InTheNeutralCorner View Post
Quote Originally Posted by miles View Post
Quote Originally Posted by InTheNeutralCorner View Post
This last talk between the officer and the driver would have been more accurate if we have this exchange of conversation before that:

Officer's Dad: That driver is driving drunk. I can not prove it but he is driving drunk.

Officer: I better stop him.

The only reason that the officer stopped the driver is because of his dad's suspicion and the officer demands a breathalyzer test in the absence of any signs or symptoms of intoxication. Fortunately for all of us, this is not allowed in a democratic country.

Based on the above, the driver then has the right to refuse the breathalyzer test. But what did the driver say:

Driver: Okey, I'll do the test but I'll just blow a little.

And yet the driver is blamed for that.
You are an idiot.
Majesty has his own interpretation of the conversation between the officer and the driver. I did not call him any name because of that because he is entitled to his opinion. I just presented my own version and you call me that. Shouldn't there be an opposing view to bring balance to this forum? Isn't this supposed to be an open forum and everyone here is entitled to present their own opinion? Do you have to lower yourself by resorting to name calling? Not everyone in here shares your belief as much as I acknowledge that not everyone in here shares in my belief.

What in my interpretation of the officer and driver's conversation did you not find aggreeable for you to call me that? Can you please tell me?

As you can see, I still haven't called you any unpleasant names.
I still have not been told what is idiotic with my post, otherwise I am owed an apology.