If he was, wouldn't he have beaten Froch when they fought? Surely Froch's wins over Dirrell, Taylor and Abraham are better than or at least as good as Pascal's wins over Diaconu (x2) and an upset win over Dawson?I explained my reasoning in another post, Pascal's win over Dawson is better than any Froch victory and I feel that Pascal is also the better, more complete fighter.I'd have Froch probably at #10 I guess.
I made a list the other day, I'll see if I can find it.
Edit: After looking at my last list, I decided to make a new one.
1. Pacquiao
2. Mayweather
3. Martinez
4. Ward
5. JM Marquez
6. Monteil
7. Bradley
8. Pascal
9. JM Lopez
10. Froch (maybe?)
The top three are the only clear-cut choices for their positions IMO.
Edit x2: You have Dirrell in your top 5?
froch beat Pascal so how can you put him beneath him? That's silly.So pascal beating dawson is better than Froch beating pascal? SillllllllyyyyyyyI explained my reasoning in another post, Pascal's win over Dawson is better than any Froch victory and I feel that Pascal is also the better, more complete fighter.I'd have Froch probably at #10 I guess.
I made a list the other day, I'll see if I can find it.
Edit: After looking at my last list, I decided to make a new one.
1. Pacquiao
2. Mayweather
3. Martinez
4. Ward
5. JM Marquez
6. Monteil
7. Bradley
8. Pascal
9. JM Lopez
10. Froch (maybe?)
The top three are the only clear-cut choices for their positions IMO.
Edit x2: You have Dirrell in your top 5?
froch beat Pascal so how can you put him beneath him? That's silly.
The Froch fight made Pascal the fighter he is today. He's a much better fighter now than he was then.
Bookmarks