Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
Quote Originally Posted by Bilbo View Post
Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
You meant to say "I'm surprised Carl Froch is NOT number 1"

I agree Froch should be above Haye but Khan is above both P4P. Froch has the best resume. I think Khan would beat FRoch P4P. That's all she wrote.
More of your subjective p4p nonsense. You have to apply the rankings criteria Fenster. It's all about the criteria.

Haye, Froch, Khan is a fair order based on acomplishments, opponent's, weight class, performances etc.

Your opinion that Khan might be Froch in a mythical p4p matchup has no bearing on where they should rank according to the appropriate criteria.That is why you cannot understand p4p.

Also, God is. The Jews rule. Miles is boring.

And that is all.
Highlighting the obvious flaws/inconsistencies in a particular system/belief doesn't mean one doesn't understand it.

Shall we go through this all over again? ()

Froch and Khan not only have ZERO form that relates them but also it is impossible to compare the strength, abilty and skill level of fighters around 168 to those around 140. You can do no better than take a GUESS

I agree completely. Which is why I base my p4p on acomplishments not on a mythical matchup between the pair.

Froch is clearly above Khan p4p based on opposition fought, opposition beat, comparison of losses etc.

Khan may well beat Froch in a mythical matchup, but to me that is neither here nor there, Froch must be above Khan because he has fought better fighters, beaten better fighters, and not lost to as mediocre a fighter, or been knocked out.

You disagree with this?

Also, dinosaurs and man did coexist. And Miles is still dull.

For now, that is all.