10 Most Accomplished of My Lifetime

[marbleheadmaui]

Interesting thread...

Ali- He is Ali what else is there to say, 1st 3 time LEGIT HW champion, beat more HW legends then any other 2 hwts combined...reinvented himself more then once...Again he is Ali his accomplishments speak for themselves

Mike Tyson- Like Ali an easy answer is He's Mike Tyson and that should be good enough. His best days had questionable comp but man did he walk through guys, Until his decline he dominated like no other HW...His over all attraction to the sport...Youngest HW champion, some of the largest live gates ever, one of if not the biggest PPV attraction of all time...remember PPV was just getting off the ground when Tyson was selling more then most of todays guys...He always kept you wanting more!!! Not many fighters have that ability despite what they can do in the ring

Roy Jones Jr- Middleweight, Super Middleweight, Light Heavyweight and HW champion, had skill we had never seen ina fighter, his athletic ability at MW and SMW were nothing short of jaw dropping, he DOMINATED his weight classes for years..5 or 6 time time world champion

Oscar De La Hoya- six division world champion, maybe the most popular fighter since Ali in terms of fanbase and drawing ability, fought the best competiton available he sought them out!!! Faced JCC, Pernell, Hopkins, PBF, Mosley, Trinidad, Quartey, Pacquiao.Vargas, Campas, Gatti, JJL, Paez, Ruelas, Hernandez,Camacho and the list goes on...Plus went on to be one of the most successful promoters ever....DLH wins even when he loses because he doesnt lose fans and uses the bout to further boxing one way or another

Sugar Ray Leonard- WW, JMW, MW, SMW and LHW world champion, fought Hagler, Hearns, Duran, Benitez, was not until after some wars and eye injuries did he ever look ordinary, popular top resume champion 5 weight classes three of the most memorible rivalries ever.....

Thanks for your thoughts. A couple of counters
1. The only way Tyson can make a list like this is if you add entertainment as a criteria. He was a THE MAN champ with two defenses. And he was NOT the champion until he defeated Spinks. More on that below.
2. The equating of alphabet belts with true champions is a curse of the last 15 years. It literally is Bullspit. If you're an American it is equating division champs with the World Series Champ. If you're a soccer fan it is like equating World Cup semi-finalists with the WC champion. The alphabet straps literally are meaningless in determining a champion. For that concept to have meaning in boxing it is because the title is WORLD Champion. That means there can only be one per division at a time.

Let's look at Roy Jones as an example.
160-He beat BHOP for a vacant strap. At the time BHOP was the 8th ranked middle in the world. At the time the middles were a mess and stayed that way for another seven years. In NO sense was Jones CHAMPION here the way Hagler or Monzon was.
168-Again, an enormously muddled division. Jones claim rests on his defeat of James Toney. A GREAT win. But why was Toney a strapholder? he'd taken it from Tony Thornton, ranked #8 at 168. The lineal champion at that time was Michael Nunn who had taken the crown from Victor Cordoba who had taken it from Chris Tiozzo etc. Roy has no legit claim here either.
175-This one is easiest of all. Darius Michlashewski won, in the ring, every belt Roy held here. It was simply stripped because Darius wouldn't pay sanctioning fees...and Roy wouldn't fight him. Zero claim
Heavyweight-John Ruiz? Come on. Lennox Lewis was the lineal champ in a line going back all the way to Patterson.

A last point on Jones. He had monster TALENT, his skill set was seriously deficient. His footwork was awful, he had no jab, his balance was only ok, it's just that he was blessed with such amazing natural gifts he was able to win in spite of mediocre skills.

By comparison, in the days of eight divisions and one champ per? THE WORST champion had the equivalent of eight of today's belts and two division champions like Robinson had the equivalent of 16 and Henry Armstrong held every belt between 126 and 154. That's 24 belts.

See how silly this gets when one values the alphabet straps!


Oscar was THE MAN in two divisions. A fine fighter. But the only way he makes a list like this is if you count entertainment value rather than in-ring accomplishment.

Leonard belongs though I think my reasons are far better than yours