
Originally Posted by
marbleheadmaui

Originally Posted by
miles

Originally Posted by
marbleheadmaui

Originally Posted by
miles
That is horrible. Really horrible.
It's such a poor country as it is and the only way to relieve some of that is to have fewer children. Only a complete arse could be against supporting contraceptives.
Pacquiao's comment about multiplying was also tasteless and crude. So every one should have as many children as they can eh Manny? Are you going to pay for them?
Yet there's actually no evidence supporting the notion that a declining population is linked to prosperity is there?
To have 2 children or to have 10? You tell me which is easier to raise on an average income. I would assume it is cheaper still to raise no children. I said nothing about a declining population anyway, it is common sense to assume that too many children is costly and likely to keep you in poverty.
In THIS case common sense is simply wrong. The causes of poverty are largely unrelated to family size or national population.
So tell me how one income can provide for 10 children when such an amount leaves most families living pay check to pay check with only 2.
If every family in the Philipines had 10 children, I have little doubt that it would make a poor country even poorer. More food needed, more clothes to buy and no jobs for those children when they get older. And then those children go and have 10 children each. It is hopeless and pointless.
But if you believe that this is a positive thing and actually makes society a better place, I am curious to know how.
Bookmarks