Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 32

Thread: Low blows. Why are they bad?

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    McAllen, Texas?
    Posts
    5,505
    Mentioned
    177 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1243
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Low blows. Why are they bad?

    I haven't seen last night's fight, but let me comment in general.
    Have you ever seen a fighter, in the heat of a fight that he is winning, complain about a low blow? I think that, generally, it is a guy looking to get out of a fight, and steal a win or, at least, justify a loss, that complains about low blows.
    You know what I think is far more troublesome? In a clinch, when he raps on your kidneys.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Dawson Springs, KY
    Posts
    8,430
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1478
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Low blows. Why are they bad?


  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    In a hole in the ground
    Posts
    23,387
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3400
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Low blows. Why are they bad?

    Quote Originally Posted by :::PSL::: View Post
    Thanks, cool video and how ironic Abner Mares was the guy doing the experiment!

    It answered some questions but not really though. I can understand how a shot to the balls could be clearly awful but how many low blows actually hit the balls thoguh? 1 in 5? It seems to me that most 'low Blows' are just below the belt line but still well above that area, I mean the belt line seems to be at the belly button whereas most peoples balls are a good 8 inches or so below that I'd imagine, yet fighters routinely throw themselves to the ground when they get hit on at hip level or even slightly above.

    To Agbeko's credit though, he didn't complain at all during the fight and just kept working. Judah by contrast was a complete bitch.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Dawson Springs, KY
    Posts
    8,430
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1478
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Low blows. Why are they bad?

    Quote Originally Posted by Bilbo View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by :::PSL::: View Post
    Thanks, cool video and how ironic Abner Mares was the guy doing the experiment!

    It answered some questions but not really though. I can understand how a shot to the balls could be clearly awful but how many low blows actually hit the balls thoguh? 1 in 5? It seems to me that most 'low Blows' are just below the belt line but still well above that area, I mean the belt line seems to be at the belly button whereas most peoples balls are a good 8 inches or so below that I'd imagine, yet fighters routinely throw themselves to the ground when they get hit on at hip level or even slightly above.

    To Agbeko's credit though, he didn't complain at all during the fight and just kept working. Judah by contrast was a complete bitch.
    Maybe it hurt so much because there's not a lot of fat and muscles in pelvic area.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    The Fighting City of Philadelphia
    Posts
    2,469
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1601
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Low blows. Why are they bad?

    I really dont get the whole low blow thing. I been hit low many times, while wearing the standard metal foul protector, and have never really felt a thing.

    However, a punch to upper leg or hip can be effective.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    11,841
    Mentioned
    60 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2042
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Low blows. Why are they bad?

    I'm liable to agree with the convention that low blows shouldn't be allowed, although I think anyone bringing in high-waisted shorts to take advantage of this should get a kick down there to try and teach them a lesson.

    With the protector in play, I think the effect on mobility from the hip or leg shots can be just as bad as the shots to the nuts. And after all, it is what has helped to make boxing the sport of kings it is today, fought by entirely honourable and gentlemanly pugilists.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    11
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Low blows. Why are they bad?

    they are low and the hurt, simple.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    VA for life, 2 up 2 down
    Posts
    617
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    894
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Low blows. Why are they bad?

    Quote Originally Posted by :::PSL::: View Post
    Oh the irony
    If you think you can......you can, if you think you can't .......you're right!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Low blows, what's your definition?
    By SigmaMu in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 01-14-2012, 10:38 PM
  2. 5 blows to the back of the head
    By SoBlue in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 07-17-2009, 04:44 PM
  3. Tito Got Away With A LOT Of Low Blows
    By BoomBoom in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 01-21-2008, 09:59 PM
  4. Replies: 28
    Last Post: 06-14-2007, 09:31 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing