My elder sister passed away in 1999. Her birthday was September 11th so it just makes me remember her more, which depending on my mood/state of mind can be good or bad.
 |
|
|
|
Thanks: 0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Anteater Lieutenant
Array
Re: 9/11
My elder sister passed away in 1999. Her birthday was September 11th so it just makes me remember her more, which depending on my mood/state of mind can be good or bad.
Saddo Fantasy Premier League
2011/12 - 2nd
2012/13 -1st Hidden Content
2013/14 - 3rd (Master won)
Saddo World Cup Dream Team
2014 - 1st Hidden Content
London
Array
That's what the guy that shot Gabby Giffords watched....just sayin'Originally Posted by smashup
Old Guard
Array
Re: 9/11
Just want to get this out of the way before the nut cases get excited.
Skyscrapers are designed to fall down in a stacked manner in the event of a massive structural fault - it's better than having the whole thing topple over on top of half of your city.
Steel does not have to reach melting point for it's structural integrity to be severely weakened.
Most buildings are not plane-proof and fabricating the towers being taken down by a bomb would be a lot simpler and leave a lot less 'loose change' than taking the buildings down with a bomb and only pretending that a plane did it... Why needlessly over complicate your own conspiracy?
My view on the conspiracy nuts is that believing that they are completely safe and that their government is in complete control and that travesties like 9/11 only happen in the greater interest of the nation at some cold, calculating government's whim makes them feel somewhat less vulnerable than if they could possibly be at any risk from an outside force.
Kick his ass Sea Bass!
Array
Re: 9/11
I did not realize it was on television.
"If there's a better chin in the world than Pryor's, it has to be on Mount Rushmore." -Pat Putnam.
I missed me, so Im back!
Array
Re: 9/11
Very good, clear thought and reasoning.Just want to get this out of the way before the nut cases get excited.
Skyscrapers are designed to fall down in a stacked manner in the event of a massive structural fault - it's better than having the whole thing topple over on top of half of your city.
Steel does not have to reach melting point for it's structural integrity to be severely weakened.
Most buildings are not plane-proof and fabricating the towers being taken down by a bomb would be a lot simpler and leave a lot less 'loose change' than taking the buildings down with a bomb and only pretending that a plane did it... Why needlessly over complicate your own conspiracy?
My view on the conspiracy nuts is that believing that they are completely safe and that their government is in complete control and that travesties like 9/11 only happen in the greater interest of the nation at some cold, calculating government's whim makes them feel somewhat less vulnerable than if they could possibly be at any risk from an outside force.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks