Quote Originally Posted by AdamGB View Post
Just want to get this out of the way before the nut cases get excited.

Skyscrapers are designed to fall down in a stacked manner in the event of a massive structural fault - it's better than having the whole thing topple over on top of half of your city.

Steel does not have to reach melting point for it's structural integrity to be severely weakened.

Most buildings are not plane-proof and fabricating the towers being taken down by a bomb would be a lot simpler and leave a lot less 'loose change' than taking the buildings down with a bomb and only pretending that a plane did it... Why needlessly over complicate your own conspiracy?

My view on the conspiracy nuts is that believing that they are completely safe and that their government is in complete control and that travesties like 9/11 only happen in the greater interest of the nation at some cold, calculating government's whim makes them feel somewhat less vulnerable than if they could possibly be at any risk from an outside force.
Very good, clear thought and reasoning.