Re: Fighters you dislike who everyone else seems to love

Originally Posted by
THE THIRD MAN
I will get shot down for this: Lennox Lewis was just one big lumbering oaf! Everyone loves him on here, i don't! He got flattened a couple of times, definitely lost the 2nd Holyfield fight, never fought Bowe and yet is rated so highly on here. Ali and Holmes would've out boxed him easily, probably stopped him. Foreman would've have blasted him into the 7th row and prime Frazier and Tyson leave him in the Hasim Rahman position within 5 rounds.
I know i am in the minority on this as the Lewis nuthuggers out there will no doubt give me grief for expressing my opinion on Lennox Lewis, i have seen three toed sloths move faster than Lewis at the zoo!
Yeah, history is doing a pretty good job of idolising Lewis retrospectively. he didnt get much credit overseas from the Americans and the Brits never really took to him either. He was not a 'natural' fighter who loved the combat and liked to make people look foolish or to hurt them but he was probably one of the finest 'athletes' that has ever walked into the ring. Wlad is as well - it used to be rare that you'd see guys 6'5" or bigger who were graceful and had good hand/eye coordination, but they are getting to be the norm now. I thought Lewis was a phenomenal athlete, who knew how to use his athleticism very well (and we criticise the Klits for that now), but he was a 'made' fighter rather than a natural. I don't think he was as bad as you do, but I donlt think he was as good as some people think either.
If God wanted us to be vegetarians, why are animals made of meat ?
Bookmarks