is the wba still worthy of its status as one of the most pretegious world titles?

[Dave Hughey]

is the wba still worthy of its status as one of the most pretegious world titles?

im not so sure, 3 champs in each division? does it now mean anything to be wba world champ when there is a super champ

Now I'[m all for there being more than one association at the top, spreads the wealth, helps more fighters make a living out of the sport, but more than one champ in a single governing body?

if your not the best in the world how can you be the world champ?

To answer the main question, I think that they are holding onto what credibility they have left due to it's longevity and history in the sport. They are making a mockery of the sport now and it's not fair on fans or fighters. IMO they don't deserve their status will keep it due to the fact they are the original governing body.

I'm not sure I agree with you wanting more than one association at the top though. For me an ideal situation would be for all bodied to be taken over by an organization that want the best fighter in each division to be champ and that would be determined by making all current champs fight each other until we have only one champ in each division. I know that is never going to happen but it is the ideal situation in boxing for me.

I agree about the one world champ. In reality there can only be one. Not two, three or four world champs. Doesn't make sense.