Which skill or attribute do you guys think was/is better?

[captainanddew]

Floyd doesn't use a shell. Winky Wright and Clottey have used the shell. Hands high, gloves covering face, arms in tight so you don't have much to hit except for the forearms.

Mayweather uses the shoulder roll and anticipation which isn't a shell defense. He looks to counter shots while the "shell guys" like Wright and Clottey just stand there and try to block and when you finish throwing they try to throw back.

As for RJJ's speed during his prime vs Floyd's shoulder roll, I think Floyd's defense is better. While Floyd did avoid a few fighters, he faced better competition as a whole than Roy did during his prime.

[CFH]

I'll take Mayweather's defence over Jones' any day.

[Spicoli]

As an attribute? I'd take Jones phenomenal reflex and instinct. It was a double edge sword for the other guy, from defense to offense in the blink of an eye often with emphatic WTF impact.

[JonesJrMayweather]

Floyd doesn't use a shell. Winky Wright and Clottey have used the shell. Hands high, gloves covering face, arms in tight so you don't have much to hit except for the forearms.

Mayweather uses the shoulder roll and anticipation which isn't a shell defense. He looks to counter shots while the "shell guys" like Wright and Clottey just stand there and try to block and when you finish throwing they try to throw back.

As for RJJ's speed during his prime vs Floyd's shoulder roll, I think Floyd's defense is better. While Floyd did avoid a few fighters, he faced better competition as a whole than Roy did during his prime.

Floyd's defense is based off of the Philly Shell.. in fact the "shoulder Roll" is just another name for it.... The first name and most known is "the philly shell"

[JonesJrMayweather]

I must didnt ask the question correctly

Which do you guys think was more/is of an obstacle, or which would you rather face if you were the opponent? I'm not asking which would you rather as a skill for yourself... Which do you think you would stand the better chance against?

[CFH]

I must didnt ask the question correctly

Which do you guys think was more/is of an obstacle, or which would you rather face if you were the opponent? I'm not asking which would you rather as a skill for yourself... Which do you think you would stand the better chance against?

I guess I would rather face someone like Jones. Because he wasn't technically sound like Mayweather, there was a much smaller margin of error for him. Even in his prime, if he had made a mistake you could have made him pay. With Mayweather, because he's so technically sound, even it's much less likely that he makes a mistake, and even if he does he's in a position to mitigate any damage that is caused.

Just my $0.02.

[JonesJrMayweather]

I must didnt ask the question correctly

Which do you guys think was more/is of an obstacle, or which would you rather face if you were the opponent? I'm not asking which would you rather as a skill for yourself... Which do you think you would stand the better chance against?

I guess I would rather face someone like Jones. Because he wasn't technically sound like Mayweather, there was a much smaller margin of error for him. Even in his prime, if he had made a mistake you could have made him pay. With Mayweather, because he's so technically sound, even it's much less likely that he makes a mistake, and even if he does he's in a position to mitigate any damage that is caused.

Just my $0.02.

Interesting point... I actually saw it in the complete reversal. Not 1-1 translation though... I've seen floyd with all of technical sound skill and defense be caught several time by guys who weren't that fast. Where as Jones, I can only think of maybe once during his prime where he took a flush punch. I mean in real time, it took 15 years before he was hit with a flush enough shot to kayo him. Not too mention, floyd was easier to walk down because no one really feared his power despite his remarkable defense. I think as someone said earlier, if you missed a shot on Jones it could have been the end of the night.

[Spicoli]

I mean really Jones's style and defense was one big mistake or flaw. All of what made it work was the price he made you pay trying to capitalize, if at all possible in first place. What he had you can't train or relate to many different fighters. I'm the furthest thing from a Roy defender but while Mayweather is a defense wiz he, I believe, is more familiar to war-game against and set plan of attack for. Floyd has mad defense knowledge and reverse gear but between the two he was the far more 'common' style of the two as far as boxing 101. What really makes it for me is the price guys payed trying to penetrate each defense.

[JonesJrMayweather]

I mean really Jones's style and defense was one big mistake or flaw. All of what made it work was the price he made you pay trying to capitalize, if at all possible in first place. What he had you can't train or relate to many different fighters. I'm the furthest thing from a Roy defender but while Mayweather is a defense wiz he, I believe, is more familiar to war-game against and set plan of attack for. Floyd has mad defense knowledge and reverse gear but between the two he was the far more 'common' style of the two as far as boxing 101. What really makes it for me is the price guys payed trying to penetrate each defense.

That's what I thinking. Floyd is superb, but because he's still conventional in a sense he's much easier to set a game plan against. I mean floyd was arguably outboxed by castillo over twelve rounds. And that's when he actually used more defense.. meaning he still used a lot of lateral movement plus the shell, now he doesn't use his legs as much.

[captainanddew]

I must didnt ask the question correctly

Which do you guys think was more/is of an obstacle, or which would you rather face if you were the opponent? I'm not asking which would you rather as a skill for yourself... Which do you think you would stand the better chance against?

I guess I would rather face someone like Jones. Because he wasn't technically sound like Mayweather, there was a much smaller margin of error for him. Even in his prime, if he had made a mistake you could have made him pay. With Mayweather, because he's so technically sound, even it's much less likely that he makes a mistake, and even if he does he's in a position to mitigate any damage that is caused.

Just my $0.02.

Interesting point... I actually saw it in the complete reversal. Not 1-1 translation though... I've seen floyd with all of technical sound skill and defense be caught several time by guys who weren't that fast. Where as Jones, I can only think of maybe once during his prime where he took a flush punch. I mean in real time, it took 15 years before he was hit with a flush enough shot to kayo him. Not too mention, floyd was easier to walk down because no one really feared his power despite his remarkable defense. I think as someone said earlier, if you missed a shot on Jones it could have been the end of the night.

floyd fought much better guys in his prime than Jones!!! It wasn't that hard for Roy to avoid being hit when he was fighting cops, firefighters, and cab drivers.

[captainanddew]

I must didnt ask the question correctly

Which do you guys think was more/is of an obstacle, or which would you rather face if you were the opponent? I'm not asking which would you rather as a skill for yourself... Which do you think you would stand the better chance against?

I guess I would rather face someone like Jones. Because he wasn't technically sound like Mayweather, there was a much smaller margin of error for him. Even in his prime, if he had made a mistake you could have made him pay. With Mayweather, because he's so technically sound, even it's much less likely that he makes a mistake, and even if he does he's in a position to mitigate any damage that is caused.

Just my $0.02.

Interesting point... I actually saw it in the complete reversal. Not 1-1 translation though... I've seen floyd with all of technical sound skill and defense be caught several time by guys who weren't that fast. Where as Jones, I can only think of maybe once during his prime where he took a flush punch. I mean in real time, it took 15 years before he was hit with a flush enough shot to kayo him. Not too mention, floyd was easier to walk down because no one really feared his power despite his remarkable defense. I think as someone said earlier, if you missed a shot on Jones it could have been the end of the night.

floyd fought much better guys in his prime than Jones!!! It wasn't that hard for Roy to avoid being hit when he was fighting cops, firefighters, and cab drivers.

I am a huge fan of Roy. He had freakish athleticism.
I was once a huge fan of Floyd (before he stopped taking risks).

While Floyd had alot of fights that could have been made (Kostya, PW-147 version, Cotto-pre Margarito beatdown, Margarito, ), he still faced pretty good competition.

Roy's competition left alot to be desired. Would Roy have been caught more if he faced better guys? Maybe. My heart (as a fan) thinks he couldn't have been hit alot by anyone during his athletic prime. But my head tells me we never saw him push himself during that time and thus we are left with question marks.