I think he pretty much did fight the best guys available, but he was in a relatively weak era.
I think he pretty much did fight the best guys available, but he was in a relatively weak era.
Agreed on both counts.
Kessler was his best win imo. Bute, Ward, Dirrel and Froch would all have been better than anybody else that he fought. BUT...he did beat the best available and we cannot knocked that and who's to say that he wouldn't have beaten better fighters had they been available.
God is a concept, By which we can measure, Our pain, I'll say it again, God is a concept, By which we can measure, Our pain, I don't believe in magic, I don't believe in I-ching, I don't believe in bible, I don't believe in tarot, I don't believe in Hitler, I don't believe in Jesus, I don't believe in Kennedy, I don't believe in Buddha, I don't believe in mantra, I don't believe in Gita, I don't believe in yoga, I don't believe in kings, I don't believe in Elvis, I don't believe in Zimmerman, I don't believe in Beatles, I just believe in me!!
46 and 0 by the way 3 ABA'S
What's wrong Calzaghe was the best we had,is it because he is FROM WALE'S and he is a winner people dont like winner's 46 AND O AND 3 ABA'S.![]()
Last edited by Vendettos; 10-03-2011 at 08:22 AM.
You say tomato,
‘n I say …… it correctly.
My i just say i am not a boy, o that word winner i like winner's and this is a boxing FORUM is it not and JC was a boxer was he not.So it must be the 46and 0 record that get's under people's skin but we all dont like a winner do we so that why we have Carl Froch.
![]()
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks