Larry can be irritating at times. I mean Lewis didn't have a jab?? Give me a break! I DO believe Holmes had a better one than Lewis but Lennox still had an excellent jab, in fact it was his best weapon. I think I might actually go for Lennox to beat Holmes too, I mean we all talk about Lewis' defeats but don't forget Holmes in his prime was given a very hard fight against Witherspoon, now I personally think Lewis would have made short work of Witherspoon. I may be wrong but I think it would have been a Bonecrusher moment.
Of course this doesn't tell us much, it's the old horses for courses factor and how well two guys do against a common opponent can be very misleading. I just feel Lewis had more in his arsenal than Holmes.
Another irritating point about Holmes is he refuses to accept he may not have been the greatest boxer ever and if you use logic when he is questioned he rubbishes it. I once saw an interview where he was asked how he would have gone on against Ali a few years earlier and he just says he would have done the same and Holmes made Ali look shot. But then later on in the same interview he was asked how he feels he would have fared against Tyson when he was younger and he says he was on the slide and it would have never happened like that in his prime (something I actually agree with). The thing is Holmes against Tyson was around the same age as Ali when he face Holmes yet he is allowed to be on the slide and Ali (though he clearly was) was not.


Thanks:
Likes:
Dislikes: 

Reply With Quote

I know Lewis didn't have a bad chin, but aside from Shannon Briggs he never beat anyone who was able to dent it. Lewis never clearly beat a good fighter who had a jab that gave him problems either. Even Evander had a lot of success working his way inside with it in their rematch.

Bookmarks