Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 124

Thread: The best

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    North Wales
    Posts
    9,844
    Mentioned
    392 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    958
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: The best

    All you Froch fan's your man give's his all but Joe was a diffrent level ALL I GOT TO SAY 46 AND 0 Mr Knight you just come off the Froch forum what it must make you just a little sick your man 's not THAT GOOD
    Last edited by Dia bando; 09-30-2011 at 07:36 PM.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    75
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    724
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: The best

    Quote Originally Posted by Dia bando View Post
    All you Froch fan's your man give's his all but Joe was a diffrent level ALL I GOT TO SAY 46 AND 0 Mr Knight you just come off the Froch forum what it must make you just a little sick your man 's not THAT GOOD
    ah, come on thats very unfair. I am a fan of both of them. and I dislike them both in some ways Carl for beng a big mouth and JC for fighting nobodies forever.

    Froch has fought (and won versus) better boxers, theres no doubt about it now. His limits have been exposed, but so have JCs. Joe struggled against a cagey, even dirty, fighter like B-Hop (although he won on workrate and fitness obviously). So a fit Bhop who didnt gass might well have got the decision on him back in the early Norties. JC wouldnt be 46-0 if hadnt cherry picked - but hes not alone in that respect. Sugar Ray Leonard cherrypicked too.

    My point rests on the fact that Carl Froch has beaten a greater number of better fighters than JC, and desnt cherrypick - this cant really be denied, can it? If you still deny it, consider this - if JC had fought and beaten the fighters Carl Froch has done in the last few years, would he be a greater champion than he is now? Well of course he would a greater champion with even more respect, in fact he would be a much more revered champion with all his doubters won over....and so clearly and blatantly what Carl has done boosts his resume prodigiously too. You cant have your cake and eat it with this argument.

    Not denying that JC was the most accomplished at holding the title of supermiddleweight champion, and clearly make the list of the top ten supermiddleweights ever. But Froch clearly has the superior RESUME, just as you would have to say a 'parallel world' Calzaghe who fought all the fighters Froch has would definitely be superior in resume to 'our world' Calzaghe.
    Last edited by RohanKnight; 10-01-2011 at 01:01 PM.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    9
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: The best

    just as long as you Calzaghe fans stop using Eubank, a great fighter to prop up Joe's record, praise the man all you want

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    North Wales
    Posts
    9,844
    Mentioned
    392 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    958
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: The best

    Just some point's Froch fight's with his left hand by his waist, and he is very open to counter's he has a good chin. Joe would have made him look A FOOL just not on his level, i have seen many great champ's over the many year's and Joe is up there with them but NOT Froch . By the way Ward will out box him sorry to say it he is not that good.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing