Quote Originally Posted by frankenfrank View Post
Have no doubt : Griffin would've won , unless , and even then it's just a maybe d fight takes place in d UK .
If it was simply when Griffin was hit his best then Eubanks was worn by then , if it is a prime vs prime then Griffin would still have won , as he outpointed d better (than Eubanks) Toney twice and rightfully won vs Jones as well .
Eubanks was taylor made 4 Griffin stylistically .
Griffin liked fighting cautious counter punchers and don't expect d man who beat Jones 2 lose 2 Eubanks .
I thought Montell Griffin got two gifts vs James Toney, the 1st fight was close enough but i feel James Toney edged it. But the rematch on the other hand was a total robbery James Toney won clearly.

And Montel Griffin didn't beat Roy Jones, he had some success early on. Then RJJ figured him out he floored Montel Griffin, then had him in deep trouble in the 9th round. And Montel Griffin was on the verge of being stopped.

I don't agree with what RJJ done hitting Montel Griffin while he was on one knee, but Montel Griffin surely made the most of it. But i don't see how you be a winner while laying on your backside.

The difference between the two is that Chris Eubank, at his best could go to another level. He had more heart and will, aswell as being the bigger puncher.

And prime for prime if Chris Eubank felt he was losing to Montel Griffin, he would of found a way to win. Chris Eubank wasn't always a cautious counter puncher the man was in quite a few wars.