Well because in most cases people are convicted of a murder based on their being evidence of them having committed it.
Your conclusion seems to be this, a girl is found dead. I believe her flatmate killed her. Unless we can prove that she didn't then she must have.
That's a rather strange form of justice.
There was no evidence of Amanda Knox being at the crime scene. Her DNA was not found on Meredith Kercher at all. Nor was her boyfriend's.
By contrast, the man who is in jail serving time for Meredith's murder, Randy Guede, his DNA is all over the crime scene and Meredith's body.
The involvement of Knox and Sollecito was part of the 'Satanic orgy' hypothesis of the Italian prosecutor. He initially believed Knox, Sollectito, and Amanda's boss, a guy called Lulumba did it in some form of satanic sexual serial killing ritual.
His evidence for this? On the night of the murder Amanda had sent a text to her boss saying simply 'See you later'.
Lulumba was cleared as he had a cast iron alibi, but by then Randy Guede's DNA had been found all over the crime scene and instead of just doing him for the murder, the prosecutor was intent on proving his satanic ritual slaughter hypothesis so he kept that idea and just substituted Guede for Lulumba.
But it was based on no actual evidence at all. Which has since been demonstrated and Amanda is finally free.
It was a total miscarriage of justice. The prosecutor who got Amanda Knox jailed has since been served with a 16 month jail sentence of his own for illegally hacking into phones of journalists and fellow police do to with another case. Google him. Guilano Mignini.
She was totally set up.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks